Apply variable naming convention to Richards local operator
Summary
The following discussions from !93 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@sospinar started a discussion: (+2 comments)
Before removing the WIP again, I will modify the name convention within the local operator. In !112 (merged) finally I got to a name convention that I think is more expressive:
Convention Meaning <description>
+_i
<description>
with respect to the inside entity.<description>
+_o
<description>
with respect to the outside entity.<description>
+_f
<description>
with respect to the face entity (or intersection).<description>
+_g
<description>
with respect to the global grid.<description>
+_n
<description>
in normal direction.Notice that when working with gradients, the suffix for normal direction can be combined with the first three suffixes (
_n_i
,_n_o
, and_n_f
). When it's not specified, is understood that it is with respect to the face (_n
\equiv
_n_f
).
Proposal
Adjust the local operator of the Richards model to this naming convention.
How to test the implementation?
Everything works as before
Related issues/MRs
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information